 |
|
|
|
Who's More Evil: Scientists or Hitler? Scientists of course. As I investigate the world with my newfound curiosity I can’t help but see an ugly pattern emerge. There seems to be a major contradiction in the world of science that has baffled me since Darwin’s Theory of Evolution was shoved down my throat in freshman biology. As I advanced in my science classes the same basic foundation of all biological life has been repeatedly hammered into my head over and over. My physical anthropology book was perhaps the most indignant, devoting nearly two whole pages to comparing science to religion, or “magic” as the author called it. Not that I give two shits about religion or magic or the comparison of religion to magic. I don’t. Fuck religion and fuck magic. Anyways… So I read the words and memorize this shit for tests and although it seems to have many holes, I keep an open mind. But as I read current events and the goings on of the scientific community I can’t help but wonder if anyone actually believes this shit. I mean, we’re being taught that this rock we live on arose by chance, life formed and evolved by chance and continues to thrive completely by chance. That’s fine. I’m fine with that. Shit has to happen somehow; why the fuck do I care how? But the actions of modern day scientists really force me to question if they actually believe it. Most people that have strong beliefs tend to live accordingly but as has been shown, the scientists are only second to their mortal enemies, the Christians, on the hypocrisy scale. Scientists say “Religion is full of shit. Creationism is preposterous and intelligent design is about the stupidest thing ever invented by the republicans. Life absolutely arose spontaneously, evolved by chance, and serves no useful purpose. Hmm….I know, let’s feverishly defend this single point for some reason yet at the same time use our large brains to intelligently re-design this messed up old world. Let’s crack the genetic code so we set right all those silly little mistakes that nature has made over the past 3.8 billion years. Oh what, these chromosomal abnormalities were fixing? No no no, they have nothing to do with evolution, they are just mistakes you see. I mean what possible purpose does trisomy have? This is merely a flaw and needs to be corrected….intelligently of course.” And so the scientist labors day after day in his clean white lab coat to save humanity from the horrors of chance, the very thing he is defending while simultaneously destroying. What the fuck? A perfect example of this is the new obesity “pandemic”. Everywhere we turn we see bullshit regarding this issue. Were told that fat people are lazy, stupid, poor sons of bitches that deserve to die. That may be but has it occurred to anyone that we might be witnessing Darwin’s theory in action before our very eyes? Seeing as how a civilization like ours has never existed, don’t you think that natural selection would still continue to progress evolution? Why wouldn’t it? And since the jungle has changed, so have the favorable characteristics. It is my belief that alcoholism, drug addiction, pedophilia, and obesity, among many others things, is natural selection at work. The people stricken with these problems are unable to cope with life in the current environment. As these ailments get passed from generation to generation we slowly see natural selection in action. The ones that are able to cope thrive, those that can’t die off. Isn’t that the very taproot of ALL biological science, the basis of the theory that has withstood the scrutiny of over 100 years of testing only to be further solidified by its doubters? So why the fuck is the scientific community so adamant about fixing these problems? Wouldn't that be a total contradiction of ones belief? Enter the liberal scientist.
1.) Socially retarded or unacceptable. 2.) Hiding from life and dealing with reality. 3.) Suffer from feelings of inferiority. 4.) Have an insatiable desire to prove themselves (cloaked by claims of a desire to help people). 5.) Portray or believe themselves the victim. 6.) Convince themselves that the strong are their enemy. Why else would you become a scientist? To help people? Hahahahah. That’s a good one. Seriously though. For one to put oneself through that amount of stress willingly, one must have a self serving agenda; even if it isn't consciously. If scientists are actually out to help people then why has the earth been thrust into a steady nose dive since some ass hole came up with the scientific method? So now we have people with inferiority complexes investigating the universe. Fine. Someone is bound to do it. I sure as hell don’t want to do it. Let the socially retarded have their fun. It keeps them from bothering me. But wait, all of a sudden the very foundation of life turns out to be just like their childhood, pointless and devoid of all meaning. The foundation of life is built upon what they have been running from their entire fucking lives. So here is the liberal scientist finding all this information. With new information comes a sense of power. And with a feeling of inferiority comes a duty to protect all things weaker than you. All of a sudden, all these “minor” flaws that chance has created can now be undone. Disease can be eradicated, genetic abnormalities can be prevented and retards can live long (yet pointless) lives. The very foundation of all biological understanding and processes can now be controlled and manipulated and are left in the hands of the liberal scientist. So what are the consequences? That has remained to be seen in it’s FULL capacity but we are all suffering it’s slow but devastating effects. Just look at the world liberal scientists have created in the past 200 years. The very underlying events that cause the theory of evolution to work and life to thrive are being systematically destroyed. This allows the less suited genes to thrive and ultimately taints the gene pool. The current social ethical order has no forethought of consequences but only in satisfying their guilty conscience. I read an article today about a shit load of gorillas dying from the Ebola virus. Who cares you say? You guessed it. Liberal scientists. One of the first things discussed was how to stop it. Excuse me, did I miss something? You mean you want to go into the jungle, disregard the very natural law your career is built upon and administer vaccinations to these gorillas? What the fuck? Are you high? I have never heard of such hypocrisy. This is but a single example. All one needs to do is turn on the news or read a newspaper to get a perfect example of the hypocrisy going on in the world of science. As much as I hate conceded conservative shit stains, I really don’t see science doing much good without them. If it weren't for their dogmas and backward beliefs, science would most certainly have destroyed us by now or at least done a lot more damage than it has so far. We need some people with balls in the scientific community. People like Vin Diesel. He'd be like “Fuck curing disease, fuck correcting social ills, and fuck genetic research. We have found the answer and we will leave well enough alone. If idiots have to die then let them. If retards have to die then let them. That is the natural order of things. So be it." Then he'd kick someone is the face and fuck some hot chick to spread his superior seed. That's what we need in science. Anyways, I'm getting off track here. Ted Kaczynski gave a wonderful example of the type of society that is likely to rise out of the ruins of liberal science. In Kaczynski’s world, things are intelligently redesigned to fit neatly within the desired specifications of the current system, a genetically altered world without thought of the consequences. But then the current system fails and comes crashing down (which WILL happen sooner or later). The once favorable characteristics become liabilities and as a result a large portion of the population dies. Don’t you see? If this natural selection thing is correct, it will ALWAYS win. So why the fuck are we fighting it tooth and nail? Call him crazy but at least Kaczynski was not afraid to shed some blood to have his point heard (targeting liberal scientists I might add). It’s time to leave well enough alone and start looking at the data. Life is random. Life is pointless. Life is progressed by random mistakes, not intelligent progression. If you believe that, I mean honestly believe that, I don’t understand how you can keep from closing your lab & accepting that we have found the answer and realize that any further explanation would be foolish. But that won’t happen. Much like political liberalism, scientific liberalism is not about making the world a better place or doing what’s right. It’s about a selfish pursuit to make up for all that is lacking in ones own miserable life. It’s about getting that Nobel Prize and finally showing the world that you are important. But in the grand reality of things you are not important. You, like me, are simply the current manifestation of billions of years of mistakes. If some asshole was there to save the species that went extinct that gave mammals the edge, you nor I would be here to debate this issue. So please, for gods sake, get your head out of your ass and accept life as it is instead of trying to cram it neatly into the current ethical bubble.
For some reason people just can't believe that someone could
simultaneously be
against both religion and science. If you have read this far and
still feel as though this is an anti-evolution piece then please do
us all a favor and remove yourself and any other offspring you may
have infected the world with from the gene pool.
-= Bagoda =- |
